Artemisia Gentileschi:
1593-1652 was an Italian Early Baroque painter, today considered one of the most accomplished painters in the generation influenced by Caravaggio. In an era when women painters were not easily accepted by the artistic community, she was the first female painter to become a member of the Accademia di Arte del Disegno in Florence. She was one of the first female artists to paint historical and religious paintings, at a time when such heroic themes were considered beyond a woman's reach. Artemisia Gentileschi was born in Rome, July 8, 1593, the first child of the Tuscan painter Orazio Gentileschi, one of the best representatives of the school of Caravaggio. Artemisia was introduced to painting in her father's workshop, showing much more talent than her brothers, who worked alongside her. She learned drawing, how to mix color and how to paint. Since her father's style took inspiration from Caravaggio during that period, her style was just as heavily influenced in turn. But her approach to subject matter was different from her father's, as her paintings are highly naturalistic, where Orazio's are idealized. The first work of the young 17-year-old Artemisia was the Susanna e i Vecchioni (Susanna and the Elders) (1610, Schönborn collection in Pommersfelden). The picture shows how Artemisia assimilated the realism of Caravaggio without being indifferent to the language of the Bologna school
During the trial Artemisia was given a gynecological examination and was tortured using a device made of thongs wrapped around the fingers and tightened by degrees ?? a particularly cruel torture to a painter. Both procedures were used to corroborate the truth of her allegation, the torture device used due to the belief that if a person can tell the same story under torture as without it, the story must be true
Artemisia Gentileschi:
(Born July 8th 1593, Died 1653)
Artemisia Gentileschi was the most important, in fact the ONLY important woman painter of Early Modern Europe.
She was born on July 8, 1593 to artist Orazio Gentileschi, and his wife Prudentia Montone, who died when Artemisia was only 12. Her father trained her from an early age as an artist, mostly for his own benefit.
He didn’t expect his daughter to become an artist, he just expected her to be competent enough to assist him. He introduced her to the numerous artists of Rome, including Caravaggio whose use of dramatic chiaroscuro (light and shadow) came to have a great influence on her work. As a woman she was excluded from apprenticeship in the studios of successful artists, she was excluded for any official training or education. She remained illiterate, unable to read or write at all until adulthood. She relied on her own innate skill and the technical instruction of her father to produce her early paintings. However, regardless of these disadvantages, she was producing works which were remarkable at the young age of just seventeen.
This is when she painted her interpretation of Susanna and the Elders, (painted in 1610). This was a radical painting. Other contemporary paintings of this subject focused on the men and portrayed Susanna in the role of seductress and whore. Artemisia showed two lecherous old men leering over the wall at a shy and terrified and young woman. It was this painting that forced her father to recognize her as more than his assistant and a painter in her own right. It soon became obvious that his daughter was more talented than him.
As was the normal practice of the time; Orazio Gentileschi worked in collaboration with several other painters. One of these was a sleezy young man from Florence, called Agostino Tassi. Orazio apparently took this young painter into his home, without any checks on the young mans background, introduced him to his daughter and allowed the young man unchaperoned access to Artemisia on the pretext of providing her with tuition.
Since Tassi had previously earned the reputation as a man not to be trusted around women, it’s hard to understand why Orazio willingly allowed this, but he did. Tassi pursued Artemisia and eventually cornered her and brutally raped her. When she admitted the rape, which was about a year after it happened, her father filed suit against Tassi for injury and damage.
When Artemisia accused Tassi of rape it seems the father turned against her and was more concerned about the family name and the unlikelihood of Artemisia ever finding a husband than he was about the ordeal suffered by his daughter. During the year following the rape, Tassi manipulated and blackmailed Artemisia.
He told her no one would believe her, her reputation was ruined and she would be scorned by every one. He promised to marry her if she kept quiet and allowed him to share her bed; and she agreed, probably because she felt she had no choice. Remarkably; the transcripts of the seven-month-long rape trial have survived and amongst the evidence is the record of the damage inflicted to Tassi by Artemisia in her ferocious attempt to fight him off.
According to trial records Artemisia testified that Tassi, with the help of family friends, had attempted to be alone with her repeatedly, and raped her when he finally succeeded in cornering her in her bedroom. She told how he tried to placate her afterwards by promising to marry her, and how he successfully gained access to her bedroom on the strength of that promise.
She told how he always avoided keeping his promise and never actually married her. The trial records could be written for any modern tabloid, they tell how she was accused of not being a virgin at the time and of having many lovers before the incident. She was forced to undergo examination by midwives to determine whether she had been "deflowered" recently or a long time ago.
Perhaps even harder to bare for Artemisia was the testimony of Tassi that her artistic skills were so poor he had been employed to teach her the rules of perspective. He claimed this is what he was doing on the day of the alleged rape. Tassi denied ever having had sexual relations with Artemisia and brought witnesses to testify that she was "an insatiable whore." Their testimony was refuted by Orazio (who brought countersuit for perjury), and Artemisia's accusations against Tassi were corroborated by a former friend of his who recounted Tassi's boasting about his sexual exploits at Artemisia's expense.
It was then revealed that Tassi had earlier been imprisoned for incest with his sister-in-law and had been charged with arranging the murder of his wife. He was ultimately convicted on the charge of raping Artemisia; Tassi was convicted, but released by the judge. That was the same judge who ordered Artemisia to be tortured as a means of proving her honesty. She risked her painters hands to the thumb screw in order to prove her innocence and even after she was believed he served under a year in prison and to make matters worse, he was then invited back into the Gentileschi household by Orazio.
This unwelcome invite no doubt encouraged (the already pregnant) Artemisia into the hastily arranged marriage to Florentine artist and family friend Pietro Antonio di Vincenzo Stiattesi. They married just one month after the trial ended, in November of 1612, and then moved to Florence. The marriage only lasted a few years but while she was married she and her husband both worked at the Academy of Design, and in 1616 Artemisia became an official member of the Academy, which was previously unheard of for a woman. This honour was only made possible because she was supported by her patron the Grand Duke Cosimo 11, member of the powerful Medici family. Prior to this, although she was the main bred winner of the family, it was her husband who negotiated commissions and the buying and selling of her work and equipment. Her paintings were owned by her husband, she was virtually owned by her husband, and all dealings concerning patrons, commissions and finance, were dealt with by the husband but; following her admission to the Academy, she became an emancipated woman and was able to conduct her own affairs. Membership of the Academy allowed Artemisia to officially gain emancipation and independence. During her time in Florence, her patron, the Grand Duke, commissioned several paintings from her, he was a real fan of her work but when he died in 1621 she left Florence and returned to Rome as head of her own household. By this time Artemisia had grown into an educated and cultured woman, mostly self taught and she was a prolific and respected painter.
Over the next few years she moved around, always as head of her own household which usually comprised of herself, her daughters and her maidservants, and always as a successful painter. She was commissioned by some of the periods’ most influential people for works in Rome, Genoa, Naples and Venice. She was continually struggling to balance her own artistic preferences with the preferences of her patrons, who made her livelihood possible. She was also constantly seeking new patrons. The patron she finally attached herself was King Charles I of England. Artemisia was in residence at the English court between 1638 and 1641, she was one of many continental artists invited there by the art-collecting king.
She may even have gone to England at her fathers request to assist him in his ambitious project of decorating the ceilings of Queen’s house at Greenwich. In the years immediately following the rape and trial father and daughter were estranged, but in later life they were reunited and are known to have worked together. After civil war had broken out in England in 1641 Artemisia returned to Naples where she lived until her death.
She remained very active at Naples, she painting at least five variations on Bathsheba and perhaps another Judith during those final years. During her last ten years, her primary patron was Don Antonio Ruffo; more is known about these final years than many others due to 28 of her letters to him which have survived.
The exact cause and date of Artemisia's death is not recorded, but she most likely died in 1652. Despite being one of the best painters of her time, despite her extraordinary talent and technical expertise; the rape trial, her unconventional life as an emancipated female painter, and her preference for paintings of powerful women struggling against male dominance, did not endear her to the male aristocracy.
The only record of her death is in two satiric epitaphs, frequently translated and reprinted, they make no mention of her art but figure her in exclusively sexual terms as a nymphomaniac and adulterer. Thirty four of her paintings survive today, as well as the near complete transcript of the rape trial, published in full in Mary Gerrard's Artemisia Gentileschi, The Image of the Female Hero in Italian Baroque Art. This is a book worth reading.
Art historian Charles Moffat believes Artemisia may have committed suicide, which would explain why the cause of her death was not recorded. Personally I find that hard to believe, I can’t imagine why a woman who had the courage to be an independent woman in an age of the patriarch, who had suffered rape but refused to be victimized and who lived through the brutalizing ordeal of the rape trial and torture would then, when she had found independence and success, commit suicide. We will never know with certainty how or why she died, but we can know she was a remarkable painter, and more importantly, a remarkable woman.
http://www.maggiemilne.co.uk/
Maggie Milne Fine Artist and Portrait Painter
This is what she says of herself; 
‘’I am an award-winning artist with more than 32 years of professional experience and I specialize in the study of the human figure and portraiture, although I sometimes work within the field of still-life and abstract composition. I live and work in Dundee where I am a part-time lecturer at Dundee College. I graduated from Duncan of Jordanstone College of Art, University of Dundee in 1979 and since that time I have executed more than 180 commissioned portraits and have exhibited widely in galleries throughout the UK, including the National Portrait Gallery, the Mall galleries, and the County Hall Gallery in London, the Royal Glasgow institute and the Royal Scottish Academy.
My work is held in public and private collections and I have appeared on BBC television in the series ‘Star Portraits’ first shown on BBC1 in 2004.’’
This lady is a painter of portraits and the human figure. In portraiture, she creates a perfect likeness which remains painterly as opposed to photographic. Her paintings are atmospheric and use shape, colour, texture and composition to accentuate the sitters personality and character.
Her life studies suggest movement and mood by merging anatomical precision with abstract shapes. This is true especially of her more recent life studies which move more toward geometrical abstraction. She was the winner of the television programme “Star Portraits”, hosted by Rolf Harris, with her portrait of Meera Syal, the actress, comedienne and writer.
She is a graduate from Duncan of Jordanstone College of Art, Dundee in and her work is found in galleries and exhibitions all over Scotland. She has had many exhibitions all ove rthe UK and has been commissioned for more than 100 portraits. 
István Csók
I spent the entire weekend from Friday through to Sunday helping a friend decorate her living room. I helped her choose the paper months ago and then, just before we were about to start, I had eye surgery and the whole thing was delayed for months. A couple of weeks ago we stripped the walls and half painted the ceiling.
Since then she has finished all the painting and last weekend, finally, I hung the wallpaper. I was looking for paintings in a blue/ grey tone to get inspiration for a painting for her new walls, and I came across this artist. I didn’t find the inspiration I was looking for but I did find this weeks subject for the art blog
From Wikipedia, 
István Csók (February 13, 1865, Sáregres – February 1, 1961) was a Hungarian Impressionist painter. Csok lived and exhibited in Paris for a portion of his life. He became most famous in Hungary for his nudes, portraits, and landscapes of the Lake Balaton. Csok exhibited in Rome, San Francisco, Pittsburgh, and London. He won the Kossuth Prize twice. 
A couple of weeks ago I mentioned to my art tutor that I would like to do more still life, he replied that it would suit my style but be careful not to do the ‘usual flowers and fruit stuff’.
I agreed at the time but after seeing these, I think flowers and fruit make good subject. I love the colours and shapes he has here and the fluid way in which he paints them.
He carried these colours and fluid movements on from his still lifes in to the backgrounds of his portraits. The subject often sits in a garden or beside a floral arrangement.
His more formal portraits tend to be bold paintings with bright contrasting colours.
He is little known these days but during his life time he was a popular and much respected European painter,. An example of Csók's work can be glimpsed behind the opening credits of the 1971 film Countess Dracula. This is an 1896 painting showing serial murderess Countess Elizabeth Bathory enjoying the torture of some young women: in an inner courtyard of one of her castles, naked girls are being drenched with water and allowed to freeze to death in the snow. The original painting was destroyed in World War II and so far, I’ve been unable to find a picture of it. 
JOHN JOHNSTONE (born 1941 Scotland)
I’m sure I’ve mentioned this man before; a couple of his works (including the Dylan one) were on display at the gallery I visited yesterday. I rather like his work, mostly because his is an excellent draughtsman.
His observation and drawing of the human form is spot on. I suppose it’s because I enjoy life drawing and portrait painting that I understand how difficult it is to get it right. But John Johnstone manages every time; he is one of Scotland's leading contemporary artists working in the figurative style. The Dylan painting and the Check out painting are both quite old works.
I like them. Someone has already pointed out that the Dylan painting shows Dylan with a bass guitar (which his didn’t play) and with Alan Ginsburg playing the piano, I have no idea why this is but it does make for an interesting painting. I also saw the ‘Checkout’ painting yesterday. The amount of detail in this painting is amazing, you can get lost in it. I wouldn’t particularly want to hang it on my wall, but it is fascinating to stand and look at, there is such meticulous attention to detail. The packets are all painstakingly accurate and the dress and mannerisms of the people are brilliantly well observed.
He is a professional Dundee based artist. John Johnstone was born in Forfar in 1941 and studied at Duncan of Jordanstone College of Art, Dundee between 1959 and 64 where he was highly commended.
After receiving a major travelling scholarship and using it to visit a number of European cities, he returned to the same college and taught there for many years.
He is a regular exhibitor at the Royal Scottish Academy and the Scottish Society of Artists and is a professional member of the Scottish Society of Artists and Scottish Visual Arts. John Johnstone is a unique artist - in the special sense that he has no problem in being original.
He combines his technical skill at drawing people and capturing their essence with the sort of wild imagination we see in children’s book illustrations or fantasy/ surrealist paintings.
He is one of Scotland's leading contemporary artists working in the figurative style. The Dundee based painter has exhibited widely in Scotland as well as galleries in London and Kingston Jamaica. In other words, he is a professional artist, working within the Scottish Art world and practicing his art with a high degree of technical expertise.
He writes ; "My paintings seem to be expressing something either serious or amusing about life. They depict people acting out minor dramas. Gesture, composition, characterisation and setting are important. There is an element of gravity in them, but the humorous side probably eclipses that aspect." In recent years, he has explored etching. There is much detail in his work which rewards close viewing. John has exhibited widely and has work in numerous public and private collections including those of HRH the Duke of Edinburgh and The McManus Gallery. 
This unwelcome invite no doubt encouraged (the already pregnant) Artemisia into the hastily arranged marriage to Florentine artist and family friend Pietro Antonio di Vincenzo Stiattesi. They married just one month after the trial ended, in November of 1612, and then moved to Florence. The marriage only lasted a few years but while she was married she and her husband both worked at the Academy of Design, and in 1616 Artemisia became an official member of the Academy, which was previously unheard of for a woman. This honour was only made possible because she was supported by her patron the Grand Duke Cosimo 11, member of the powerful Medici family. Prior to this, although she was the main bred winner of the family, it was her husband who negotiated commissions and the buying and selling of her work and equipment. Her paintings were owned by her husband, she was virtually owned by her husband, and all dealings concerning patrons, commissions and finance, were dealt with by the husband but; following her admission to the Academy, she became an emancipated woman and was able to conduct her own affairs. Membership of the Academy allowed Artemisia to officially gain emancipation and independence. During her time in Florence, her patron, the Grand Duke, commissioned several paintings from her, he was a real fan of her work but when he died in 1621 she left Florence and returned to Rome as head of her own household. By this time Artemisia had grown into an educated and cultured woman, mostly self taught and she was a prolific and respected painter. 
